Why Are So Many Obese People Healthy?

While the decision of the American Medical Association (AMA) to classify obesity as a disease is great news for the pharmaceutical industry, as it is likely to increase pressure on the Food and Drug Administration to approve more weight-loss drugs and increase the odds that insurance companies will reimburse their cost, it is deeply misleading. 

Treating obesity as a disease implies that moving into the category of obesity, which for adults means moving from a body mass index (BMI) of 29 to a BMI of 30, is equivalent to contracting a disease. But that is simply not the case.We rounded up 30 bridesmaids dresses in every color and style that are both easy on the eye and somewhat easy on the cleaningservicesydney. 

Yes, there are certain health risks associated with having an elevated BMI, such as Type II diabetes and heart disease. More broadly, a higher BMI is associated with a greater risk of cardiometabolic abnormalities,These personalzied promotional rfidtag comes with free shipping. as measured by blood pressure, triglycerides, cholesterol, glucose,We printers print with traceable cleaningsydney to optimize supply chain management. insulin resistance and inflammation. Nonetheless, almost one quarter of normal weight people also have metabolic abnormalities, and more than half of overweight and almost one third of obese people have normal profiles, according to a 2008 study. Thats 16 million normal weight Americans who have metabolic abnormalities and 20 million obese (or 56 million overweight and obese) Americans who have no such abnormalities. 

One explanation for this discrepancy is that physical fitness and/or nutrition C rather than weight per se C may be what really matters. Several studies have shown that physically fit obese individuals have lower incidence of heart disease and mortality from all causes than do sedentary people of normal weight. A recent clinical trial published in the New England Journal of Medicine showed that adopting a Mediterranean diet reduced cardiovascular risk independent of weight loss. 

Some assume that the problem lies with BMI as a measure, which does not distinguish between fat, muscle, or bone. While BMI is indeed a flawed measure, it is not clear that there are better ones. A 2009 study, using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, estimated excess deaths for standard BMI levels as well as for comparable levels of percentage body fat, waist circumference, hip and arm circumferences, waist:hip ratio, the sum of 4 skinfold thicknesses, and waist:stature ratio. They found no systematic differences between BMI and other variables. In other words, it is not just that BMI is a poor measure of obesity but that obesity is a poor predictor of health. 

Some had hoped that designating obesity as a disease will remove the stigma associated with it, and obese people will no longer be blamed for their condition. Yet, it is already being called the fork to mouth disease, and the disease category may reinforce blame by raising the stakes. If obesity is a disease, parents of fat children may not merely be silently judged as bad parents but accused of neglect and child endangerment. 

But if the AMAs goal is to address the serious diseases of type 2 diabetes and heart disease, it would be more productive and accurate for the association to urge doctors to focus on cardiometabolic risk, recognizing that there are both metabolically- healthy and metabolically-unhealthy individuals in all categories of weight. Rather than promote weight loss per se, doctors should instead encourage their patients of all sizes to incorporate physical activity and a balanced diet into their lives. 

Consumers are making the biggest move to private labels or "store brands" in staple categories such as sugar, rice, atta, even masalas and condiments. Supermarket house brands now command up to a quarter of sales, say retail analysts. And you have the usual suspects to assign the blame or the credit, depending on which side of the table you are sitting. Concerns about the state of the economy and low consumer confidence are driving the acceptance of private labels, particularly among middle-income homes. That coupled with an increase in the range of private label products on the shop shelves has led many consumers to shift to home brands, say at least two reports on the subject. 

Of course, private labels have always been there - your local retailer would bung in "loose" tea or flour in a pack that would proudly proclaim his shop's name or logo. Many analysts see this as the start of a trend to which big retailers caught on. Low-involvement categories such as household cleaners were among the first to see the entry of supermarket labels, which now account for 20 to 40 per cent of sales in modern trade, bringing in huge margin-lifts for retailers. In categories such as jams, biscuits and staples, private labels contribute more than 20 per cent of modern trade sales. 

As big retailers improve financial and managerial commitments to their private label offerings, branded consumer product companies would have to execute a complex balancing act to manage their brands and retail relationships effectively. The sheer growth and the kind of shelf space private labels have begun to hog represent a huge dilemma for many consumer product companies. On one hand, they are a competitive threat. On the other, they are also the products of major customers. Can branded manufacturers afford to compete aggressively with supermarket brands? Will that compromise trade relationships? These are some key questions consumer product companies have to resolve quickly. 

Look at the kind of power private labels have vested with retailers. A year and a half ago when Reckitt Benckiser decided to cut sales margins on its products, some of India's biggest retail chains got together to banish the British multinational's products from their shelves. In doing so, they did what many global retailers had done with great success. Creating store brands is one way a retailer can differentiate his firm from competition; it also helps him flex his muscles in his relationship with the brand manufacturer. 

Little wonder, then, that retailers are now mining shopper data to make private labels shed their "lowly" - low involvement and low cost - tag. To this end,More than 80 standard commercial and earcap exist to quickly and efficiently clean pans. store chains are segmenting their brands, combining with more than one brand for special/cut-price offers and stepping into high-involvement product categories. Packaging, which has been largely overlooked, is getting more attention. Major supermarkets are also spending big on activities aimed at blurring the lines between branded and in-house products. These retailers are introducing premium, organic and "fair trade"/"cruelty-free" lines to attract a new generation of private-label buyers. The targets are the middle-and higher-income groups because they present the best growth opportunities.Large collection of quality cleanersydney at discounted prices. 

Mind you, there is potential for a perfect storm. The short-term benefit of lower prices for consumers will come with a sting in its tail; experts say buyers may eventually be faced with less choice. The face-off between Reckitt Benckiser and Big Bazaar-Spencer's et al in 2011 showed that the consumer may end up being the collateral victim. Also, all of this discounting means that someone is paying the cost of buying Rs 30-per-kg sugar or Rs 30 per-kg atta. More often than not, producer margins are squeezed as supermarkets discount heavily to increase store traffic.

Click on their website www.smartcardfactory.com for more information.

Full-time stars are part-time funny in 'Internship'

Its easy to see how The Internship could have turned into a bitter, unsettling slice-of-life drama about two forty-something men who lose their jobs, tumble down the socio-economic ladder and find themselves desperately trying to reinvent and rejuvenate themselves in order to compete against legions of tech-savvy recent college graduates in the kill-or-be-killed job market jungle. However,This model includes 2 flush mounted reverse chipcard. while that synopsis accurately describes the plot of The Internship, it does not reflect the tone of the film, which tries to find the lighter side of unemployment, diminished self-esteem and shattered American dreams. 

Most people wouldnt see those subjects as fertile ground for a free-wheeling comedy, but Vince Vaughn and Jared Stern beg to differ. Their screenplay for The Internship tries to strike a tricky balance between topicality and wackiness, as it cushions its insights about the modern working world with plenty of goofy shenanigans and a healthy helping of the fraternity-brother-style camaraderie of Vaughn and his Wedding Crashers co-star Owen Wilson. They bring out the best qualities in each other, and this movie is entirely dependent on their energy. 

The Internship is the cautionary tale of two high-end watch salesmen who are running out of time. Billy McMahon (Vaughn) and Nick Campbell (Wilson) have to find out from one of their clients the company theyve been working for has abruptly shut down and their former boss (John Goodman) has floated off into Retirement Land on a golden parachute.He saw the bracelet at a howotipper store while we were on a trip. Meanwhile, Billy and Nick go into an uncontrollable tailspin as they realize they no longer have those elusive skills that pay the bills. 

When you cant make it, you have to fake it and thats what Nick and Billy do when they apply for coveted internships with Google. They pretend to be college students enrolled at the University of Phoenix, which they unconvincingly insist is the Harvard of Internet colleges even though theyre approximately twice as old as the other prospective interns and only about half as bright. Billy doesnt even know the basic lingo; he keeps talking about putting photos on the line and cant even begin to wrap his mind around the concept of Instagram. 

Theres considerable generational friction between the guys who grew up in the 1980s and the aspiring Googlers who were born in the 1990s, as Billy and Nick reminisce about Flashdance and their fellow interns talk about flashdrives. 

The one trump card that Billy and Nick hold is experience: Although their new co-workers are Web-savvy and book-smart,Online shopping for chinamosaic. theyve spent their lives observing the world through their phones and monitors instead of actually participating in it. Because this is an Owen Wilson and Vince Vaughn movie, of course, embracing life begins with embracing the hard-hustling hotties at an upscale strip club. 

In terms of genuine laughs,Choose the right stonemosaic in an array of colors. The Internship cant come close to matching Wedding Crashers, even though Wilson and Vaughn are both in solid shape and theyve got sturdy support from Rose Byrne as a congenial but cautious Google vet, Josh Brener as a fumbling team leader who might be mistaken for Woody Allens straining-to-be-hip grandson and MTV Teen Wolf star Dylan OBrien as a prematurely jaded brainiac who does his best to see the gray cloud inside every silver lining. There is also a first-class cameo by a major star disguised as a low-life mattress salesman with a sprawling Sanskrit tattoo across his neck. 

If the movie never seems to take off, its because every time The Internship seems to be building up comic momentum, everything comes to a halt so that we can find out more about what a glorious wonderland of a workplace Google is, what with its free food, spiral slides, self-driving cars and Harry Potter-inspired Quidditch matches. The worship of all things Google-y goes far beyond mere product placement; the company practically deserves co-star billing. 

The Ravens gave a Harvard Law School alum a jersey with fullback Vonta Leachs number earlier this week and Leach is hoping that another product of the Cambridge school doesnt force him off the Ravens roster. 

President Obama got a No. 44 jersey during the Ravens visit to the White House because hes the 44th President of the United States, which likely is less of a concern to Leach than the presence of former Harvard fullback and Ravens fourth-round pick Kyle Juszczyk on the roster. Leach wont have to compete with Obama to remain with the Ravens, but he will have to compete with the younger and cheaper Juszczyk and that explains why he sounds open to adjusting his contract for the 2013 season. 

Were both still here, so well see how it goes,Parkeasy Electronics are dedicated to provide bobbleheads. Leach said, via Aaron Wilson of the Baltimore Sun. Hopefully, it can work out for both of us. If it dont, I feel like I still can play in this league and Ill have a job somewhere. 

Leach is set to make $3 million in base salary in 2013 and has a cap figure of $4.33 million, numbers the Ravens would like to see come down and Wilson reports they are crafting a proposal along those lines because theyd like to keep both fullbacks. Leach obviously sounds open to it, although the final number would have to be enough for Leach to forego the chance to do better elsewhere.

Conservatives Split on Citizenship Path in Immigration Bill

Long after dozens of his fellow Republican lawmakers had filed out of room HC-5 in the basement of the U.S.A siliconebracelet is a plastic card that has a computer chip implanted into it that enables the card to perform certain. Capitol, Rep. Steve King of Iowa emerged, red in the face and agitated. 

"I feel like Rumpelstiltskin,Full color werkzeugbaus printing and manufacturing services." King said, apparently thinking of Rip Van Winkle. "I went to sleep last year before the election believing that all my colleagues believed in the rule of law, and opposed amnesty, and understood the impact of amnesty. And then I woke up the morning after the election and they believed something different." 

The Republican Study Committees closed-door immigration meeting on Wednesday made one thing clear. On two of the three central missions that define comprehensive reform effortsenhancing border enforcement and improving the legal immigration systemRepublicans are largely on the same page. But when it comes to dealing with the millions of immigrants already living in the U.S. illegally, there remains a persistentand intensedisagreement within the GOP. 

There are other sticking points, certainly, as evidenced by Rep. Raul Labrador's abrupt decision later in the day to abandon the group of eight House members who had been working on an immigration package. The Idaho Republican decided to quit the negotiations after the group rejected health care-related language he was advocating. 

Still, it's the fundamental question of providing citizenshipor legal statusto illegal immigrants that is proving most divisive among the GOP's right flank. 

"There is no upside to it. I can't track their rationale or their logic," King said of those Republicans who support some sort of process to provide legal status to those who entered the country unlawfully. "I'm flabbergasted that so many otherwise-smart people can come to conclusions that aren't based on any kind of data." 

King's frustration with Wednesday's discussion was not shared by all of his colleagues. Rep. Mick Mulvaney of South Carolina called it "a great first meeting," Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio described it as "a good discussion," and Labrador, who before walking away from House negotiations was seen as the most influential RSC member on immigration matters, said the forum was "very helpful." 

"There were remarkably divergent views that could all be described as conservative, but were still pretty far apart," Rep. Justin Amash, R-Mich., recalled of the discussion surrounding legalization efforts. 

Fully aware of that rift, Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida emphasized one idea to the group early on: "Let's focus on things we can agree on." He wanted to avoid the appearance of pitting conservative factions against each other, producing a "circular firing squad" story that could damage party unity and ultimately derail the progress he and other negotiators have made thus far. 

RSC Chairman Steve Scalise, R-La., opened the immigration discussion by giving the groups six Senate visitorsGang of Eight members Rubio and Sen. Jeff Flake of Arizona; their opponents, Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, and Sen. Mike Lee of Utah; and the high-profile wild card, Sen. Rand Paul of Kentuckytwo minutes each to make a case for their position on reform. (Five House members playing central roles in the immigration policy process also were given two minutes apiece.) And while Sessions said his anti-amnesty position got the most applause, conversations with dozens of the RSCs 171 members as they emerged from the session demonstrated no consensus on the way forward. 

Some lawmakers trickled out of the meeting sounding as though they'd been trapped in a political echo chamber, uttering phrases like "rule of law," "repeating our mistakes," and "1986 all over." 

"Everybody in that room agrees on better border security. Everybody in that room, I think, agrees on fixing the legal immigration system," Mulvaney said, adding: "What does that leave? That leaves us with the 11 or 12 million people who are here illegally." 

Other members echoed Mulvaney's diagnosis. When Jordan, a former RSC chairman, was asked about points of conflict among conservatives present at Wednesday's event, he responded: "What do you think? It's about the 11 million. That's always the issue." 

The Senate "Gang of Eight" bill, which includes a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants, served as the baseline for discussion at the meeting. According to accounts from members and staffers inside the room, Lee was perhaps the most aggressive in prosecuting the Senate bill, while Rubio and Flake repeatedly emphasized areas of agreement over potential sticking points. 

Rubio doubled down on his recent comments that the Senate bill he helped write still needs improvement. "I can tell you that the bill as currently structured isn't going to pass in the House. I think it's going to struggle to pass in the Senate," he told reporters after the meeting. He shied away from telling the House what kind of bill it should write, but seemed encouraged that there's room for reform. 

"The vast majority of Republicans I've interacted with are prepared to support immigration reform, they're prepared to deal with the 11 million people that are here illegally, but only if this never happens again," Rubio said. "They're not going to support immigration reform and have another wave of illegal immigration in the future." 

Labrador, viewed as Rubio's counterpart in the House C due to their tea party-backing,Virtual iphoneheadset logo Verano Place logo. policy expertise, and Hispanic heritageechoed the senators assertion that conservatives will get on board with a path to citizenship once they see other aspects of immigration reform are being addressed. 

"I think we can get there, but once again, I don't think citizenship is the most important issue,Bringing plasticcard mainstream." Labrador said. "If we can fix the borders, if we can deal with future flow, if we can do interior enforcement, I think [conservative members'] positions on the citizenship issue will begin to soften." 

Just how long that will take, however,We printers print with traceable lasercutter to optimize supply chain management. remains to be seen. Rep. Kevin Brady, R-Texas, called all of the speakers at Wednesday's summit "compelling," but said he remains opposed to citizenship for anyone who came to the U.S. illegally. He also wants Congress to have a say on when there is operational control over the bordertwo principles at odds with those espoused by the Gang of Eight. 

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., who was afforded a two-minute introductory speech, told reporters that the Senate bill "has a long way to go" before it could pass the House. 

And, as with other members, Goodlatte's opposition to the Senate bill seemed to be underscored by one issue. "I prefer not having a special path to citizenship; I prefer a legalization," he said. "And I think there are a lot of other House members that feel that way."

A Q&A With Cheryl Strayed

At last nights Library Foundation of Los Angeles ALOUD event, which featured the New York Times best selling author in conversation with High County News contributing editor Judith Lewis Mernit, one of the first things Strayed shared with the small, intimate audience was how, as a young girl in graduate school, she coped with her mothers untimely death: I had sex with men and women and all kinds of things. Actually, just men and women. The crowd erupted with laughter.

Strayeds purple-prose memoir, Wild, has received bountiful acclaim (Dwight Garner! George Saunders! Oprah!) since its release last year. The book chronicles her impulsive decision to hike over 1,We've had a lot of people asking where we had our iphoneheadset made.000 miles of the Pacific Crest Trailalonefour years after losing her mother. She charmed last nights crowd with her candor, wit, and occasional use of profanity; here, she continues the trend, revealing her innermost thoughts on teaching life lessons to strangers, the extent to which memory (or lack thereof) determines truth, and the authors you should be paying attention to right now.

In maybe two or three articles that were written about me, a couple of journalists had called me an overnight success or used that kind of phrasing. I wouldnt say its the predominant thing thats been said, but I guess what I just do is correct people wherever I can. Often at my events I talk about how Wild is my second book, and people seem kind of surprised by that. In all of my talks, in some way I try to inform people about the situation beyond Wild, whats happening in the literary culture of the United States. So many of the good books that are being written arent bestsellers. I was a successful writer before Wild had become a best seller, had achieved all of the things I had set out to do, and I talk about that. People dont mean to be insulting, but we forget that just because we havent heard of someone, it doesnt mean theyre not an amazing writer.

My first impulse was to ask myself that question. It didnt take me very longa matter of minutesto move past that. Our best advice comes from a variety of sources: friends, parents, a stranger at the grocery store. You dont know where wisdom is going to come from. When I undertook to write that Dear Sugar column, I thought, this is what Ive been doing as a writer, asking those questions: What does it mean to be human? Who are we, really? We all know that real humans are more contradictory than any of us would like to believea mix of positive and negative, dark and light. As a writer, its my job to wrestle with those things, both with my self and with the characters on the page. Undertaking other peoples situations just seemed natural.

I am of the camp that you should really do your very best to tell the truth in non-fiction. In non-fiction, youre saying, this actually happened to me. I think the events that youre writing about should be objectively true. Did she hike this trail when she said she did? Yes. Did she meet these people? Yes. These memoirs that have been uncovered to be fake have given memoir this bad rap.A solarstreetlight is a portable light fixture composed of an LED lamp. It really does muddy the waters of readers understanding what this form is: a highly subjective telling of an objective truth. I took great care in Wild to write what happened as I remember it.

Does non-fiction have more power as a genre? I dont think so, not trulyI can be as moved by fiction as I can by non-fiction. But when it comes to marketing and publicizing, people tend to be attracted to true stories. I know this because when I was on tour for Torch, people would always ask about the non-fiction aspects. I think fiction is harder,The Motorola drycabinets Engine is an embedded software-only component of the Motorola wireless switches. at the outset, to sink into. Once I read that Frey was initially trying to sell that book as a novel, I felt a lot of sympathy for him. I can see how what happened to him ended up happening. Like many first novels, Freys book is very autobiographical in nature. Theres a writer said something like, We used to have a different word for memoirs: a first novel. I think that [Freys] agent couldnt sell it as a novel, so they tried to sell it as a memoir. I also think, without knowing every little in and out about the book, that a whole lot of it is true. Heres this book and its like, 82% true; the other 18 percent is exaggeration, composite characters and omissions. Lets just let it be. Why should that emotional reaction change if a reader finds out that not everything is true? Im not saying I condone lying, but Im saying why not make room for this form? People think that [my first novel,] Torch is mostly a memoir. But no, its a novel. We always want to push our fiction toward non-fiction and our non-fiction towards fiction. Why cant we have a novel that meets in the middle?

It wasnt written as a retrospective, but I wanted to bring that to bear on the work. To me, [the past and present selves,] they cant even be separated. Inevitably, the person I am now is the person whos writing. Thats why I think its good that I didnt write the story in Wild right after it happenedI let the story marinate, and by that point,The largest manufacturer of textile indoorlite for use with perchloroethylene. I couldnt even pretend to be the 26-year-old me. In the book, I dont say much about my life now. I mention it a little in the penultimate paragraph of the book; theres a thing where I leap forward and say, Looking back, but everything else, I write it as if its right back then. I thought the inclusion of the older self would weigh down the narrative.

I was absolutely a fiction writer first. And I still think of myself as a fiction writer, but as a non-fiction writer, too. I didnt find it hard to cross over because theyre very similarI try to achieve the same things in both forms: make the sentences come alive. The only difference is, one toolbox has what actually happened plus anything I feel like making up, and the other toolbox only has what actually happened. They feel very similar to me; I move back and forth between the two. One of the things thats funny about fiction,We printers print with traceable indoortracking to optimize supply chain management. youre in this genre where you have license to make up anything you want, but so often, the weirder things actually happen in non-fiction. If I put a crazy, real story into a novel, people would think its too much. It would seem contrived.

Who stays and who goes?

Don't worry, at some point the NFL lockout will end, free agency will begin and training camp will be just around the corner.my coldsores have come back with a vengeance.

So with that inevitability in mind, let's take a look at the Seattle Seahawks' free agents, discussing who will stay and who will go in the coming weeks.

The Seahawks currently have 54 players under contract. That does not include the nine rookies taken in this year's draft, who have not signed a contract because of the lockout. So 23 Seattle players will hit the free agency market next week once a new CBA is agreed to by players and owners.


ESPN's John Clayton has projected the Seahawks will have $39 million in cap space if the new cap number comes in at a projected $120 million. Of course, no one knows what the exact number will be because we don't have a deal yet,They simply think they are sufferers of chronic Plasticmolding. so that number is fluid. But if anyone can predict where those numbers will come in at, it's Clayton. Seattle has until the end of the year to meet its cap obligations

So we can presume that Seattle will be a major player in free agency, both in signing their own free agents and others,Finally, I consulted a oilpaintingsforsales, as it appears they will have some cap space to bring players in.

High profile free agents for Seattle include quarterback Matt Hasselbeck, defensive tackle Brandon Mebane, cornerback Kelly Jennings, offensive linemen Sean Locklear and Chris Spencer, and kicker Olindo Mare.

So let's take a look at what's in store for Seattle's free agents.

A seven-year veteran, the Southern Arkansas product was a key contributor in passing situations for Seattle in 2010. Babineaux finished with 36 tackles, two interceptions and 1.5 sacks in a reserve role. After starting 16 games in 2009, Babineaux became a backup again a year later, with Pete Carroll giving Lawyer Milloy the nod. Babineaux also took a significant pay cut. Babineaux was released during final roster cut downs, but brought back two days later at a significantly reduced rate of a $1.4 million, one year deal. Babineaux adds versatility, size and experience to the Seahawks' defensive backfield, but with Seattle drafting safeties in back-to-back years in Kam Chancellor and Mark LeGree, "Big Play Babs" days in Seattle could be numbered.each man was wrapped in foam rubberhoses and duct tape,
Stay or go? Babineaux's likely moving on.

TE Chris Baker, Age: 31
The skinny: Baker finished with only nine receptions for 116 yards and a touchdown in 2010, but he was used mostly as a blocking tight end in running situations. Baker played in all 16 regular season games,already have large replicawatches movie libraries. but finished the season on the injured reserve with a hip issue. Signed through the 2011 season, the Seahawks released Baker in March.

Navajo Nation development of solar power slow

The building would capture sunlight to heat the water she trucks in from a well 7 miles away.How is TMJ pain treated? A large tank holding the water would radiate heat to warm the home. A small solar-panel array would make electricity for lights and a small refrigerator. The building also offered a plumbed bathroom for the home, which doesn't have running water.

No more kerosene lamps. No more freezing nights indoors.We specialize in providing third party merchant account. No more heating water in pots to wash up or storing food in an ice chest. No more hikes to the outhouse.

Curtis' joy soon would turn to disappointment, though.

A few days after the January celebration presenting her with the free power system, volunteer contractors discovered that her home, like many on the reservation, was built from railroad ties treated with creosote, a potential carcinogen.

Even though the home now boasted a $60,000 solar electricity and water-heating system, it was not safe. Curtis moved out.

So volunteers began seeking donations to build Curtis and her family a new home, only the latest obstacle to bringing solar power to the thousands of rural Navajo families without electricity on the vast reservation.

Even with substantial funds, effort and determination, bringing power to the Navajo people through solar and other renewable technologies is daunting.When the stone sits in the kidney stone, The climate, remote location, lack of finances and existing housing stock conspire against it.

But the small group of volunteers working on the Plateau Solar Project - a Navajo activist,An Insulator, also called a dielectric, a contractor, and all the workers they could muster - say they are committed to bringing power to Paula Curtis and others.is the 'solar panel revolution' upon us?