The advent of a new year brings with it many promises. 2012 comes with the excitement of summer Olympics, the fear and anticipation of the Mayan apocalypse, and the event most closely followed: the November Presidential Election.
Five names, not including that of the incumbent, currently flood the media, classrooms, and the internet.China professional plasticmoulds, Each swears to be the best, most honest man, but how are they all such angels?
“Republican voters have been reduced to using the same criteria as a 4 a.m. barroom pickup: he has a pulse and no visible cold sores,” wrote comedian Stephen Colbert.
Five Republicans are currently battling each other on the playing fields of the 50 states for the title of the Republican Presidential Nominee. Each of the fabulous five have made mistakes, yet each man is still attempting to sell himself as “the perfect man” for the job.
“I’m not a natural leader. I’m too intellectual; I’m too abstract; I think too much,” bluntly stated Republican candidate Newt Gingrich.
If he doesn’t consider himself a true leader, then why would Gingrich be running for the biggest leadership position there is? He considers himself too much of a scholar to be a leader. By his own words,Daneplast Limited UK are plastic injectionmoulding & toolmaking specialists. he admits that he may not be the man for the job.
“Not only is Paul’s goldbuggery nutty on the merits, like his affection for forced pregnancy and severe restrictions on human freedom of movement it’s difficult to see what it has to do with freedom,” stated Matt Yglesias, a progressive writer, about Republican candidate Ron Paul.
While Gingrich considers himself to be too intellectual, many consider Paul to be too crazy. His ideas are random at best and at worst superficial attempts at winning over the public by any means necessary.
“There’s a real difference between venture capitalism and vulture capitalism. Venture capitalism we like. Vulture capitalism, no. And the fact of the matter is that he’s going to have to have up to this at some time or another,” stated candidate Rick Perry about his opponent, Mitt Romney.Silicone moldmaking Rubber,
According to his peers, Romney is a scavenger, feeding off the bones of dying companies in order to line his own pockets. Gingrich is no leader, Paul is unstable, and Romney is a buzzard. None of these men look quite as angelic as they would like their constituents to think they are. They make many mistakes,To interact with beddinges, some of which cause uproar on both foreign and domestic fronts.
“Well, obviously when you have a country that is being ruled by, what many would perceive to be Islamic terrorists, when you start seeing that type of activity against their own citizens, then yes,” Perry said.
This comment from Perry caused huge controversy. Apparently, foreign nations do not appreciate an American candidate calling them a nation of terrorists. Perry went on to defend his statement, though members of his party and the U.S. Foreign Ministry begged him to take it back.
The list of slip-ups made by each of the candidates goes on and on.Silicone moldmaking Rubber, Every day, the media produces a new scandal that has just recently come to light, or a new fumble the candidate said in last night’s debate. Despite this negativity each candidate continues to spew out nothing but good news for themselves. But who should voters believe- the men themselves or every other source that disputes their claim?
Five names, not including that of the incumbent, currently flood the media, classrooms, and the internet.China professional plasticmoulds, Each swears to be the best, most honest man, but how are they all such angels?
“Republican voters have been reduced to using the same criteria as a 4 a.m. barroom pickup: he has a pulse and no visible cold sores,” wrote comedian Stephen Colbert.
Five Republicans are currently battling each other on the playing fields of the 50 states for the title of the Republican Presidential Nominee. Each of the fabulous five have made mistakes, yet each man is still attempting to sell himself as “the perfect man” for the job.
“I’m not a natural leader. I’m too intellectual; I’m too abstract; I think too much,” bluntly stated Republican candidate Newt Gingrich.
If he doesn’t consider himself a true leader, then why would Gingrich be running for the biggest leadership position there is? He considers himself too much of a scholar to be a leader. By his own words,Daneplast Limited UK are plastic injectionmoulding & toolmaking specialists. he admits that he may not be the man for the job.
“Not only is Paul’s goldbuggery nutty on the merits, like his affection for forced pregnancy and severe restrictions on human freedom of movement it’s difficult to see what it has to do with freedom,” stated Matt Yglesias, a progressive writer, about Republican candidate Ron Paul.
While Gingrich considers himself to be too intellectual, many consider Paul to be too crazy. His ideas are random at best and at worst superficial attempts at winning over the public by any means necessary.
“There’s a real difference between venture capitalism and vulture capitalism. Venture capitalism we like. Vulture capitalism, no. And the fact of the matter is that he’s going to have to have up to this at some time or another,” stated candidate Rick Perry about his opponent, Mitt Romney.Silicone moldmaking Rubber,
According to his peers, Romney is a scavenger, feeding off the bones of dying companies in order to line his own pockets. Gingrich is no leader, Paul is unstable, and Romney is a buzzard. None of these men look quite as angelic as they would like their constituents to think they are. They make many mistakes,To interact with beddinges, some of which cause uproar on both foreign and domestic fronts.
“Well, obviously when you have a country that is being ruled by, what many would perceive to be Islamic terrorists, when you start seeing that type of activity against their own citizens, then yes,” Perry said.
This comment from Perry caused huge controversy. Apparently, foreign nations do not appreciate an American candidate calling them a nation of terrorists. Perry went on to defend his statement, though members of his party and the U.S. Foreign Ministry begged him to take it back.
The list of slip-ups made by each of the candidates goes on and on.Silicone moldmaking Rubber, Every day, the media produces a new scandal that has just recently come to light, or a new fumble the candidate said in last night’s debate. Despite this negativity each candidate continues to spew out nothing but good news for themselves. But who should voters believe- the men themselves or every other source that disputes their claim?
沒有留言:
張貼留言