To score points with rank-and-file educators, Scott has made $2,500 pay raises for classroom teachers a top budget priority.
But
to stay in their good graces — and possibly win their votes in 2014 —
Scott will need to bat down a number of education proposals moving
through the Florida Legislature, including the hot-button parent trigger
bill and a pitch to increase facilities funding for charter schools.
There's
just one problem. Opposing those bills will land Scott in the
Republican doghouse and put him at odds with former Gov. Jeb Bush, whose
nonprofit foundation has driven Florida's education agenda for more
than a decade.
"He can't do everything the teachers' union wants
or he would lose support among Republicans," Brian Peterson, a Florida
International University professor and editor of the Miami Education
Review,Want to find chinamosaic? an online newsletter. "But he is going to have to take a more moderate stance on education issues."
In
recent weeks, Scott has initiated a dialogue with the statewide
teachers' union, the Florida Education Association.TBC help you
confidently handsfreeaccess from
factories in China. Insiders say members of the governor's staff attend
regular meetings at the union's Tallahassee headquarters — a noteworthy
fact, considering the lack of a relationship up until this point.
The
raises also are significant, not only because of the $480 million price
tag but also because Scott has proposed distributing an equal amount to
each classroom teacher in Florida. Republican lawmakers have said they
would rather see the dollars distributed based on merit. But teachers
are opposed to the idea.
Some observers see Scott's proposal to
award across-the-board raises as a blatant overture to the teachers'
union.Only those users who need drycabinet require
hands free tokens. The governor historically has been a strong advocate
of performance pay. In fact,Anybody had any experience at all with
Chinese made rtls? the first bill he signed into law laid the groundwork for a merit-pay system for teachers set to kick in next year.
Scott faces a battle in getting the Legislature to approve across-the-board increases.
Last
week, Sen. President Don Gaetz, a Niceville Republican, told reporters
his "preference would be that there'd be some recognition and reward for
teachers who stay late on tough challenges and get learning gains, as
opposed to treating the best teacher in Florida the same as you would
treat the worst teacher in Florida."
Still, teachers like Jodie
Martin say they appreciate the sentiment, especially when coupled with
Scott's promise to increase spending on classroom supplies and
professional development.
"You can't just buy teachers with
$2,500," Wright said. "Our members are going to look to see where the
governor stands on charter schools, on the trigger, on merit pay. Then
we'll decide whether to support him."
Some observers believe
signing those bills would undo any political capital amassed by spending
$480 million on teacher salaries.
"He's going to have to be
very careful about what he opposes at the end of session," said Wayne
Blanton, executive director of the Florida School Boards Association.
"He knows he can't keep kicking public education around and have a
positive public opinion."
But Bush and the powerful school
choice lobby will put pressure on Scott, too. Already, Republican
leaders have signaled that expanding choice will be a top priority.
House Speaker Will Weatherford, for example, designed an education
subcommittee to focus specifically on "choice and innovation."
"Ultimately,
what is going to cause teachers to move closer to the governor is his
doing things that allow them to be more innovative and creative," said
Doug Tuthill, the president of Step Up for Students, a nonprofit
organization that supports the Florida Tax Credit Scholarship Program.
"Charter schools, virtual schools and magnet schools give teachers that
flexibility."
First, several media outlets report that
free-spending Paris Saint- Germain, the Ligue 1 club bankrolled by the
Qatar Investment Authority, is targeting Rooney and is prepared to offer
him an enormous salary. Then, reports appear indicating that United
would be willing to sell him at the right price. Next, Rooney is left
out of Manchester United's staring lineup last Tuesday in the club's
huge Champions' League encounter with Real Madrid. Rooney played the
final 18 minutes in United' 2-1 loss which saw the Premier League club
crash out of the competition. And, on Friday, United manager Sir Alex
Ferguson, speaking to the club's official TV channel, says that Rooney
"will stay." To what degree the above events are linked can be debated.
What is hard to miss though is the unmistakable whiff of "contract
renewal season."
It is that time when agents and clubs earn
their coin. And when news starts to appear which ends up favoring the
case made by one side or the other in the negotiation. Undoubtedly a
coincidence, of course.
This is pretty much what happened last
time Rooney negotiated a new contract. It was back in October 2010 and
the rumor mill went into overdrive with speculation that he would move
elsewhere for a huge fee. Rooney even went so far as to announce he
wanted to leave the club because it "lacked ambition." Less than a week
after announcing his imminent departure he signed a lucrative contract
through June 2015.
What we're seeing here is basically a rerun
with a few new wrinkles. And, barring some kind of cataclysm, things
will end exactly as before: With United handing Rooney a new contract.
But how can we be so sure?
Well, for a start there are only a
handful of clubs in the world which can match Rooney's current wages. Of
those,Gecko could kickstart an solarstreetlamps mobile
app explosion. even fewer would be prepared to spend the $50 million
plus it would take to buy him from United. Unless Rooney wants to move
to Russia or a Gulf nation, even hypothetically we're basically talking
about PSG, Chelsea and Manchester City. Leaving aside the fact that the
latter two—especially City—would represent an enormous slap in the face
to United fans, there is zero indication that either would want to make
that kind of investment on him. As for PSG, theoretically anything is
possible, but this is a club that already has half a dozen gifted
attacking players, the priority right now is making them fit together,
rather than adding another one to the mix.
There's the fact that
Sir Alex is 71 years old, the last thing he wants to do—one would
think—is have to trawl the market for someone to replace Rooney. You
would imagine that, with the clock ticking, his priority would be to
keep all his big guns happy and on message so that he can win even more
silverware.
Finally, there's the fact that United can well
afford to keep Rooney and that he is worth keeping. That's a pretty
basic concept, but an important one. Last month, the club announced that
pretax profit for the last six months of 2012 amounted to $33.3
million. And next season, the Premier League's new domestic broadcasting
deal kicks in and it is some 70% higher than the previous contract. All
of which points to cash-rich times ahead for the club.
沒有留言:
張貼留言